In sociology, why do we think of the work of Karl Marx as 'conflict Essay

In sociology, why do we think of the work of Karl Marx as conflict theory - Essay ExampleHowever, this was premier(prenominal) presented as an official theory by Karl Marxwho laid the groundwork for a number of cordial movements that would redefine history. From a sociological standpoint, what is incriminatet when Karl Marxs theory is referred to as a conflict theory? Usually, when one thinks of Karl Marx, he automatically conjures up thoughts of conflict theory. Why is this so? The reason is thatin some circlesMarx is thought to be the founder of conflict theory (Henslin, 2007, pp. 28). Social conflict theory, is, in a nutshell, that in society, there are the rich and the poorand that the rich are the brawny who usurp many of the resources and exploit the poor in order to gain to a greater extent wealth. Marxs theory was a wake-up call to the masses. For Marx, capitalism did not mean progress rather, it was a scourge on the conscience of modern man, a man who was detached from t he community and the communal struggles surrounding him. Marx often saw social conflict as rooted in private avouchership (Bartos and Wehr, 2002, pp. 40). The difference between the haves and the have-nots has always been a pressing social issue, becoming even more so when capitalism was the governing system. This is the kind of dominance that social theory rails against. Marxs main idea was that the community should struggle together. The community should expect together. ... Communist ideology gained popularity throughout the Cold War. Vladimir Lenin adopted the ideology as his own strategy to not only have the pile contribute to the acres communally, but also to empower the economy of the Russian state. Leninism was presented as the correct theory and practice of Marxism and as the theory of scientific communism, incorporating the dictatorship of the proletariatMarxs critiques were also reformulated as societal laws of development that fed into the study of class relations and production (Lowes, 2006, pp. 158). The notion that the working class was the one in harbour was the main staple of Communism. The pot were the ones in control. The working class had to conquer its freedom under the flag of the Communist party (Weitz, 1997, pp. 250). People did not own any possessions. No religious expression was allowed, and very strict laws of ethics were followed. Communism was an experiment that failedbadly. Mann (2002) states, Communist governments many of them led by men expert in Moscow are in command of nations ruling almost 800 million people (pp. 115). in that location are still Communist countries existing today. There remain at least some common features among the five remaining Communist statesChina, Cuba, Laos, North Korea, and Vietnamalthough the differences between, for example, China and North Korea are enormous (Brown, 2009, pp. 3). Many of the people in these countries subsist in squalor and have little economic or collective bargaining powe r. This is where socialism becomes an alternative option. Even though people may not like the idea of a Communist government, socialism